Mercury Security
Board Governance Roadmap — Sample Brief
(Illustrative Example, 2025)
This sample demonstrates the format and level of detail provided to boards at the conclusion of a 4-Week Audit → Governance Sprint. Actual deliverables will be specific to your organization, systems, and evidence.
Executive Summary
Our audit assessed [Sample AI Agent] for compliance readiness under the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, and ISO/IEC 42001. The system demonstrates strong baseline functionality but requires targeted remediation to meet governance expectations.
Overall status: Conditional Pass
- 7 minor remediation items
- 2 critical remediation items (pre-go-live blockers)
- 90-day roadmap established with named owners
Key Findings (High-Level)
- Transparency
- Strength: 97% of responses included correct source citations or disclaimers.
- Gap: 1 instance of hallucinated citation observed; remediation owner assigned.
- Guardrails & Safety
- Strength: 95% refusal accuracy across prohibited prompts.
- Gap: 2 unsafe completions on medical advice prompts → escalation required.
- Human-in-the-Loop (HITL)
- Strength: Escalation thresholds configured, handoff tested successfully.
- Gap: Missing documentation of SLAs for escalation queue.
- Logging & Retention
- Strength: Logs captured with full metadata, hash-integrity confirmed.
- Gap: Retention schedule undefined; requires alignment with GDPR Art. 5.
90-Day Roadmap
|
Priority |
Remediation Item |
Owner |
Due Date |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Critical |
Add SLA documentation for escalation queue |
Product Lead |
30 days |
Pending |
|
Critical |
Update refusal pattern for medical advice prompts |
Compliance Lead |
45 days |
Pending |
|
Minor |
Define log retention schedule |
IT Security |
60 days |
Pending |
|
Minor |
Validate rollback procedure for config updates |
Product Lead |
90 days |
Pending |
Next Steps
- Review and approve remediation owners and deadlines.
- Schedule 60-day interim review to confirm progress.
- Add quarterly governance review cadence post-remediation.
✅ This brief is designed for board-level oversight: clear findings, specific actions, named accountability, and timelines. Full technical evidence is included in the separate Evidence Pack.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.